As regular readers will know, I very rarely watch films, and this is my very first film review.
Generally speaking, I think films are rubbish. There are one or two that I quite like, including The Hunt for Red October and It Happened in Broad Daylight. Films that are set in a contemporary reality, that are consistent with the period they depict, that have a good story to tell, and that are presented convincingly by brilliant actors.
Uwe Boll’s film Citizen Vigilante isn’t exactly a top-class production, but it is a film set in our current reality and depicts it as it is; it features decent actors and tells a story that has the odd flaw, features passages that suddenly appear out of nowhere, which make it clear that this is a German film without actually saying so, yet whose story is at the same time so important, so relevant and so in tune with the times that the film is, in effect, banned in Germany.
You must not screen it, make it publicly available, distribute it, or do anything else with it.
Why is that? Because the FSK, acting as a government-aligned censorship body, has decided that the film has absolutely no classification – for any age group or in any context. Supposedly, this is to protect the public from violent content; yet, at the same time, the splatter film The Educational Film of Forklift Driver Klaus is deemed to be of value.
About the film featuring forklift driver Klaus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lSBwF8ojVw
So it can’t be the amount of blood and violence – Klaus would be three times ahead in that respect – so it must be down to the reality that is not allowed to be depicted.
And what does that reality look like, and where? Grooming gangs, knife jihad, organised crime. This is what predominantly Islamic immigration has brought with it since the early 1980s; ever since Angela Merkel decided in 2015 that there should be no borders of any kind, violence has exploded.
The film is set in Europe, and it makes absolutely no difference whether it’s Lisbon, Madrid, Paris, London, Amsterdam, Brussels, Oslo, Berlin, Rome or Athens; it could just as easily be set somewhere in Canada, Australia or New Zealand – the situation for the locals is exactly the same everywhere.
They’ve been inundated with so-called refugees – Muslims who rob, murder and rape to their heart’s content; the police treat them with kid gloves, and the courts let them go free. Off they go, on to the next murder.
Lawyers act as human rights lawyers, but only ever on behalf of the perpetrators; they have no interest in the human rights of the predominantly white and Christian victims. On the contrary.
And it is against this backdrop and in this atmosphere that the protagonist of Citizen Vigilante appears, and he takes revenge and metes out vigilante justice.
Personally, I would have liked to know where I could get hold of the weapons he has, but oh well…
He is taking revenge on the gang who gang-raped a 15-year-old girl, the police, and above all the judges who released those animals back into society.
The filmmaker Uwe Boll has drawn on original quotes from various judges, particularly from Germany, specifically relating to this case:
Particularly in light of the fact that last week Rupert Lowe published his inquiry into gang rapes and grooming gangs – the cover-up of which Kier Starmer, as Her Majesty’s Chief Prosecutor at the time, played a leading role in – available here:
https://osthollandia.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/acdde-therapeganginquiryreport.pdf
As a result, the fine Mr Starmer was forced by his own party to resign, because people are absolutely fed up with the whole thing…
Everyone knows the situation; everyone knows that as a local who merely asks questions, you’re more likely to end up in prison than an imported murderer or rapist.
And that’s precisely why we all know why this film was censored. We don’t need to discuss it. It is what it is.
This link from Portugal worked for me:
https://www.lookmovie2.to/movies/play/35309713-citizen-vigilante-2026
There’s a call for donations on YouTube from a certain Uwe Boll, asking people to donate if they’ve watched the film without paying (which is a bit tricky when the film isn’t allowed to be distributed).
The call came from an X account @UweBollRAWNet; if it is him, he’s 10 euros richer; if not, I’ve been scammed out of 10 euros.
Be that as it may. The film is important, not because it’s brilliant, but because it is a vital record of contemporary history. And that is precisely how the film should be viewed. What remains of statehood – which was already largely dismantled in 2015 with the abandonment of the national territory – uses state power exclusively to the detriment of the citizens, and they have both the right and the duty to reclaim that power.
How they go about doing that is irrelevant at this point.
osthollandia 